Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Yes, this post is a bit overdue. But still timely.  And promised, too

Last week (’twas the day before Thanksgiving, and all through the campus…), I went to my second Career Services seminar.  This time, it was a face-to-face session in the Historic Post Office on the Downtown Phoenix campus.  The content of the seminar was evaluating job offers and how to negotiate for what you’re worth.  Think salary.

If there was one take-away message from this session, it’s this: know what you’re worth.  Have a solid argument why you’re worth that extra $3K-$5K a year and have it thoroughly supported by concrete facts.  What did you do in previous jobs that was successful?  With whom have you associated in the past?  Organize those thoughts from least-to-most significant–with that last argument being the true moneymaker (pun intended?).

So, now that I’ve been to two Career Services events, are they worth it?  I’d say so.  With the line of work into which I intend to go, I’m not sure if they’ll help me place into a position but they have provided skills that will make me more effectively advocate for myself.

-Edward Jensen

This post is mainly written for the fine IT staff at the College of Public Programs, but if you’re an ASU student and need access to ASU’s AFS servers (more commonly referred to as My Docs), here’s what you do:

In a terminal running as root (you may need to type sudo su and enter the root password):

apt-get install openafs-client openafs-modules-dkms openafs-krb5 krb5-config krb5-user

In the installation process, when you’re presented with the “AFS cell this workstation belongs to” dialog, type in

asu.edu

The next dialog asks about the local AFS cache on your workstation.  The default is 50,000KB.  I normally accept this proposal.

OpenAFS and Kerberos are now installing themselves on your computer.  The process takes about 5-10 minutes depending on your hardware.  Quick note, however: the install will look like it’s hung.  It hasn’t; it’s just OpenAFS installing its kernel modules into DKMS.

Find krb5.conf at /etc/krb5.conf. Copy krb5.conf from another ASU machine, click here to download it, or modify it manually to contain:

[libdefaults]
default_realm = ASU.EDU
dns_lookup_kdc = true
default_tkt_enctypes = des3-hmac-sha1 des-cbc-crc
default_tgs_enctypes = des3-hmac-sha1 des-cbc-crc

[realms]

ASU.EDU = {
kdc = krb1.asu.edu:88
kdc = krb2.asu.edu:88
kdc = krb3.asu.edu:88
admin_server = krb1.asu.edu:749
default_domain = asu.edu
}

[domain_realm]
.asu.edu = ASU.EDU
asu.edu = ASU.EDU

[logging]
kdc = CONSOLE

Restart OpenAFS Client service

/etc/init.d/openafs-client restart

Now the tedious part.  Making sure you’re not root, each time you want to authenticate into AFS, in a terminal, run:

kinit asurite -l 1d

being sure to replace “asurite” with your actual ASURite ID.  You’ll be prompted to enter your password – it’s the same password you use to authenticate to other ASU services. Then:

aklog

And now you’re in!  If you have problems, then run (as root):

/etc/init.d/openafs-client restart

and if that fails, then check your network connectivity by going to a website like asu.edu.

Now, where are my files?  Each ASU student gets 4 GB of storage space that can be used for anything, really, but it’s most commonly used with My Apps.  If your ASURite id is “asurite”, then your space is accessed at /afs/asu.edu/users/a/s/u/asurite (note the three one-letter folders that correspond to the first three letters of your ASURite id.

And that’s it! Whenever a new kernel is released, DKMS will automatically rebuild the OpenAFS kernel modules into that new kernel.  It sure saves the hassle of having to rebuild the kernel modules by hand.

-Edward Jensen

[author's note: One of my roles of my internship is to coordinate the College of Public Programs's social media initiative. Here's a guide that I collaborated on with the staff of the college.]

The College of Public Programs has entered the social media frenzy. The guiding principle behind our adventure is that our presence should be continuous, engaging, updated frequently and that it should foster discussion. This push into new media is being done for many reasons, but mainly to keep the College visible to students by fostering a sense of connection, belonging and identity. Research evidence is great that 1) this sense of connection aids in recruitment and retainment, and that 2) the next wave of public relations and outreach will be through the use of new social media.

A number of outreach methods are being implemented through the Office of the Dean as a means to this end. Through the Student Ambassadors (StARs) program, current students maintain blogs offering their unedited perspective on student life in the College, at the Downtown Phoenix campus, and even in Downtown Phoenix. The StARs are working on a video series that will introduce new students to their advisors, the campus, and the community in which they will study.

We’re asking your participation to create effective presence in a number of other applications. If you have news, events, deadlines or thought-provoking issues related to life at CoPP, please pass your ideas to any Facebook administrator. The more often we post, the more connected our “fans” will feel to their College.

Want to learn more? Check out http://copp.asu.edu/socialmediaguide.

-Edward Jensen

I should think that no preface is needed. Have a happy Thanksgiving, everyone!

(if you need a refresher on all the Muppets featured in the video, go here.)

-Edward Jensen

[author's note: This was originally posted over onto my personal blog, edwardjensen.net, in response to a challenge put forth by several local bloggers. Read on...]

Ever since Mayor Phil Gordon’s State of Downtown address that seemed to go over like a lead balloon, people have been sharing their reasons, opinions, and assessments on Downtown Phoenix and how it can be improved. For starters, there’s Tyler Hurst’s analysis that sparked tonight’s Radiate Phoenix event, another analysis by Derek Neighbors, Yuri Artibise’s analysis, and others have thrown their voices into the discussion. Some have been productive voices offering concrete solutions, some have denounced the blind cheerleading that goes on, but all voices have been heard and ruminated.

Surprise: this is another post on that same topic. But, as preface, remember that I’m in the Urban and Metropolitan Studies program at Arizona State University, and as such, this is what we study. What makes cities work? What makes them not work?

Why is Downtown Phoenix not what we want it to be? How can it get there? I’m prepared to argue that Phoenix (its downtown, the city as a whole, and the region) focuses too much time and energy on the things that bring people here but not keep them here. In August, I wrote a series of posts that explored this issue. As proof for this thesis, know that for every five people that are enfranchised by the area and come here, three people are disenfranchised and leave (source: Making Sense of Place – Phoenix: The Urban Desert).

It’s important to take a step back and look at the region’s recent history. After World War II ended, those that were stationed in the various military outposts in this region came and settled here with their family. With the land readily accessible, developers built new houses on virgin land outside the central core. This began, inevitably, a culture and a mindset that if something isn’t just quite right, then just forget about it and build again—anew. Downtown Phoenix began to become desolate, and so rather than quickly fixing the problem when it would have been an easy fix, we (true to form) ignored the problem and built new urban villages away from the core. Those who could afford to leave did; those who couldn’t became disenfranchised as policy and governance focused on the new things, because they were politically more “sexy.”

This pattern repeated and repeated and that’s how we’re in this present state. Rather than maintaining and sustaining present infrastructure, we’re always looking for that next “crown jewel” in the desert.

Downtown Phoenix has many different crown jewels that are already here. Just because something is new and shiny does not mean that it’s automatically one of those jewels. Let’s focus on that infrastructure which is already here. From a physical infrastructure point of view, what’s here already is fantastic. Now we have to fill in the gaping holes with a sustainable people infrastructure.

What is this people infrastructure? I’m thinking places where people go: bars, restaurants, coffee shops, schools, parks, etc. This is what academics like to call third places—places outside of one’s home and office.

What can we do to support this people infrastructure? Make it a habit to shop and buy local. Go beyond our elected leaders’ response to shopping local (what seems like mere lip service). Tell friends, family, fellow students, colleagues, coworkers, anyone, and everyone about your favorite local places. And go with them to these places! I cannot tell you how much it pains me to see so many Starbucks cups carried by students, faculty, and staff on the ASU Downtown Phoenix campus, given the fact that the wonderful Fair Trade Café is set in the Civic Space Park.

How do we “fix” Phoenix? Recognize our past. Learn from our mistakes. Diversify how and what we build. Recognize that a healthy city needs a vibrant downtown core. Focus on institutions that keep people here instead of those that just attract new blood.

-Edward Jensen

epilogue. Join me in making a pledge to purchase all your holiday gifts at locally-owned shops across the Valley. If you’re throwing a party or preparing a big meal for your family to mark the season, shop at places like the Phoenix Urban Market or, if you must go to a supermarket, then there’s Bashas’.

One of the big initiatives I’m working on with the College of Public Programs is the Spirit of Service Scholars program.  For those unfamiliar with it, check out the initiative’s website, read Dr. Debra Friedman’s op-ed in a recent edition of the Arizona Republic, and also a response to a recent article run in The Economist.

If one were to remember why I’m doing this internship, here’s a bit of the scope:

One of the aspects of [the Spirit of Service Scholars] program is to look at how public service will evolve into the twenty-first century and to use technology to clarify the role of governance in the eyes of the public. A common complaint of constituents and clients of public agencies is that these agencies are slow to adapt to new situations, including technologies. The new public servant must be creative in adapting to new situations and must be fearless in embracing emerging technologies if we are to build a strong digital infrastructure for the public sector. [source]

There have been many projects that I’ve been working on as a means to this end (many will be shared over the coming weeks), but there’s another one that’s equally as important.  If the College of Public Programs is going to leverage itself as the premier institution for teaching the next generation of public servants, then how is that institution going to teach the next generation of public servants?

One of the more prominent debates of this generation is online learning.  Is it pedagogically sound?  Is the material that one learns in an online setting as effective as that same content delivered in a traditional, face-to-face setting?  I can say from my personal experience that I’ve had more enriching experiences in face-to-face classes than in online classes.  I’m interested to see what you all have observed.

Something that the School of Criminology and Criminal Justice (one of the four constituent schools in the College of Public Programs) has recently launched is a fully-online Master of Arts in Criminal Justice (MACJ).  In my internship, I support instructors as they transform their courses to the online format.  In my own experiences and also in reading the literature on online course development, instructors that take their face-to-face lecture materials and post them online are mosre likely to have an ineffective online learning experience.  Online courses are radically different from their face-to-face counterparts. (Captain Obvious at your command.)

The thing that I guess that the instructors that teach these courses and we that aid in developing them is that we need to keep reminding ourselves that there is a difference between online and face-to-face courses.

And this will be an interesting proposition…

-Edward Jensen

A classic line on job descriptions seems to be, “and other tasks as necessary.” This week has certainly encapsulated that statement perfectly.

As preface for explanation, since January 2008, I have been one of the College’s Student Ambassadors for Recruitment.  In summary, that initiative provides prospective students with an unedited perspective on what life is like in the College, the Downtown Phoenix campus, and in the greater Downtown Phoenix community.  With this, I have worked with the Dean’s Office in this and also varied roles.

(Hence the “other tasks as necessary” bit of the job description.)

For this past week, the usual front desk person has been on vacation (and I say, “good for her!”) but that does leave the office short-staffed.  That means that, for the past week, I’ve been covering the front desk for the Dean’s Office of the College of Public Programs.  The basic things that I’ve done include answering the phones (“ASU College of Public Programs Office of the Dean, how can I help you?”), directing traffic to the right places, and maintaining some general framework of order and control.  This has also been a beneficial time because in the periods between all that, I’ve been catching up on blogging, long-winded assignments, social media, and just about everything else.

The moral of the story? When one sees, “Other tasks as necessary,” on a job description, take it literally. One just might end up covering the front desk!

-Edward Jensen

Last night was Mayor Phil Gordon’s sixth annual delivery of the “State of Downtown” speech, and the third year with my attendance. The venue was the Civic Space Park which was decorated quite well.

Staging aside, the Mayor’s speech left me with more questions than answers. The first year I went (2007), the Mayor outlined several bold proposals for downtown, including moving ASU’s College of Law to the then two-year-old campus. The 2008 address was delivered at the then recently-opened Sheraton but with the economy having just collapsed, the highlight of that speech was for all those in attendance to ride the then yet-to-be-opened METRO light rail.

And then there was last night.

The roughly forty-minute speech seemed to lack a specific focus. Over half of the speech was dedicated to the ASU Downtown Phoenix campus. So was this the State of Downtown or the State of the ASU Downtown Phoenix campus?

My other impression from the Mayor’s speech is that this should have been delivered 3-4 years ago when the different things he was lauding – CityScape (strangely, there wasn’t one mention of One Central Park East), the UofA medical school, the Civic Space, ASU’s presence in downtown, etc. – were being pitched to the voters for their support. Except these things had already opened or are very close to opening.

Another theme I took away from the Mayor’s speech was that there is no separation between ASU Downtown Phoenix and the greater Downtown Phoenix community. The fate of one would affect the fate of the other. Granted, the two are mutually related and intertwined in some fashion, but if there’s one thing that Arizona’s economy has taught us, it’s that we shouldn’t put all of our economic growth eggs in one basket.

Granted, with the Mayor’s tenure in office coming to a close soon (he’ll wrap up his second and final term in January 2011), maybe he’s trying to cement his legacy. I’m not giving him any grief about this, but this city has a lot of issues facing it at the moment.

(It never helps with the state legislature is working against the city, or rather against the state.)

If you want to read the Mayor’s full speech, check out the Downtown Phoenix Journal article, “Recap of the Mayor’s State of Downtown Speech.”

-Edward Jensen

On Monday, I tried some emerging technologies on my own and took part in an ASU Career Services webinar.  (A webinar is a portmanteau of web and seminar – it’s one of those 21st-century emerging-technologies words.)

Anticipating that this webinar would take a lot of time, I decided that I wasn’t going to use what would turn out to be over an hour of cell phone minutes so I put my Skype subscription to good work and called into the phone system from there.  Except there was one problem: I didn’t have my audio input settings correctly configured and while I could hear everything that was being said, I couldn’t chat with the group.  Fortunately, there was an online chat component so if I did have a question, I would just type it in.  The leader of the webinar was apt on my technological diagnosis and was very accommodating of the situation.  I am rather grateful.

Technological issues aside, the webinar provided rather useful information.  If there was one take-away message from this, it would be that when hunting for jobs, take advantage of different sites but remember to evalulate them for what they’re worth.  ASU has an internal job board – Sun Devil Career Link – that is a great starting point.  The other online services – Jobing.com, Monster.com, etc. – are useful but also to a certain point.  There are instances where there really isn’t a position that’s open but companies are just getting their brand out in the marketplace.  And while it’s hard to discern that, if it’s something you want to do, then go for it.

To complement this presentation, I’m going to a face-to-face seminar in a couple weeks’ time.  And in this one, I know that (unless I’m stricken with laryngitis) I’ll be able to take an active part in the conversation.

-Edward Jensen

Review: Cloud Computing

One of the most emergent technologies out there is the rise of cloud computing.  It is something that I’m working on in seeing how our College can embrace it.  A lot of stuff that we use is out there “on the cloud.”  The most popular is Facebook.  There are a lot of computers that power the Facebook servers and enable you to hit “refresh” every 5-10 seconds.

If one uses an online storage service like Apple’s MobileMe or Amazon’s S3, then one’s files are said to be stored “on the cloud.”

In non-technical terms, cloud computing is computing resources that are distributed on a network. Here’s a better definition from Educause:

Cloud computing is the delivery of scalable IT resources over the Internet, as opposed to hosting and operating those resources locally, such as on a college or university network. Those resources can include applications and services, as well as the infrastructure on which they operate. [source]

There’s an interesting debate happening on The Economist‘s website, economist.com.  With any emerging technology, there are those who are quick to jump on its bandwagon and there are those who are cautious and not so keen to adopt that technology.

economist_cloudComputing

It’s a debate that I’m going to follow in the coming days and I’ll have their arguments summarized when the debate finishes in the coming week.  (It’s something that I’m following for the College.)  For now, why don’t you join in the debate by clicking here.

-Edward Jensen

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.